On the role of airborne ice nucleating particles in primary and secondary ice formation processes in convective midlatitude clouds
Patnaude, R. J., Moore, K. A., Perkins, R. J., Hill, T. C. J., Lawson, P., et al. (2025). On the role of airborne ice nucleating particles in primary and secondary ice formation processes in convective midlatitude clouds. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-24-0135.1
| Title | On the role of airborne ice nucleating particles in primary and secondary ice formation processes in convective midlatitude clouds |
|---|---|
| Genre | Article |
| Author(s) | R. J. Patnaude, K. A. Moore, R. J. Perkins, T. C. J. Hill, P. Lawson, Q. Mo, Adriana Bailey, S. C. van den Heever, S. Saleeby, Q. Bian, J. Chiu, P. J. DeMott, S. M. Kreidenweis |
| Abstract | Formation of ice in mixed-phase clouds may proceed via primary nucleation and secondary ice production (SIP). Primary nucleation involves the presence of ice nucleating particles (INPs), while SIP follows primary nucleation, resulting in ice crystal number concentrations N ice exceeding the number of INPs. The ice formation pathways in young congestus clouds are not well understood nor are the environmental conditions favorable for the onset of SIP. Coincident airborne measurements of INPs and N ice collected during the Secondary Production of Ice in Cumulus Experiment (SPICULE) campaign over the U.S. central Great Plains are reported for young congestus clouds. Number concentrations of INPs and N ice at temperatures between −10° and −20°C were used to categorize whether SIP was active in each analyzed cloud pass. Observational data suggested that fragmentation of freezing droplets (FFDs) was occurring and the most likely SIP mechanism for ice enhancement during the early stages of the sampled clouds, where higher cloud-base temperatures and stronger updrafts produced conditions favorable for the onset of FFD. Simple model simulations of a congestus cloud were used to compare predictions of N ice from newly implemented SIP mechanisms (including FFD) alongside those from the existing Hallett–Mossop (HM) mechanism. Although predicted N ice , when all SIP mechanisms were active, was in good agreement with observations, the dominant SIP mechanism in the model was predicted to be HM. The rate of heterogeneous freezing in raindrops was likely inhibiting realistic FFD rates in the simulated cloud. These discrepancies between the observations and simulations underscore the need for extended laboratory studies to formulate improved model representations of SIP in convective clouds. |
| Publication Title | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences |
| Publication Date | May 1, 2025 |
| Publisher's Version of Record | https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-24-0135.1 |
| OpenSky Citable URL | https://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d76w9ghw |
| OpenSky Listing | View on OpenSky |
| EOL Affiliations | RAF |