|
|
Final Cruise
Report: Western Arctic Shelf-Basin Interactions (SBI) Spring Cruise HLY-02-01
(5 May-15
June 2002) Edited by
Jackie Grebmeier, Chief Scientist University
of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37922 USA email: jgrebmei@utk.edu |
A. Introduction
The field phase of the Western Arctic Shelf-Basin
Interactions (SBI) project completed a successful scientific mission to the
Arctic on the new USCGC Healy icebreaker 5 May -15 June 2002. This was the
first interdisciplinary research cruise to this region by a science vessel at
this time of year. About a dozen interdisciplinary research projects were
included in the ship-based program, ranging from hydrographic measurements to
biological studies of various trophic levels. The goal of the SBI global change
project is to investigate the production, transformation and fate of carbon at
the shelf-slope interface in the Arctic as a prelude to understanding the
impacts of a potential warming of the Arctic. Thirty-nine stations were
occupied in the northern Bering Sea (test station), the Chukchi Sea shelf
(Herald Valley [HV] transect), the Chukchi outer shelf to Arctic Basin lines
(West Hanna Shoal [WHS] and East Hanna Shoal [EHS] transect lines), stations
near Pt. Barrow, and the Barrow Canyon (BC) transect (Figure 1). Some regions
in the study area had lighter ice cover than expected, although normal heavy
ice limited sampling in the northwest region of the Chukchi Sea and the eastern
most line in the Beaufort Sea.
The SBI project is an interdisciplinary program, where
physical, biogeochemical and biological measurements were made using a variety
of sampling devices. CTD/rosette sampling collected physical and hydrochemical
samples. Subsamples from four CTD/rosette casts were used for primary
production, chlorophyll content, nutrients, particulate carbon, inorganic
carbon, biomarkers, microzooplankton, and radioisotopes. Various nets
(vertical, bongo) were used to collect size fractions of micro-macro- and
meso-zooplankton for both population and experimental purposes. Benthic grabs
and cores were used to collect benthic fauna and sediment samples for
population, community structure, food web and metabolism studies. Off-ship
sampling by lowering personnel to the ice occurred to undertake ice
measurements and to collect ice cores. Shipboard marine mammal surveys from the
bridge were undertaken by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Limited
helicopter operations were used for ice reconnaissance, during which marine
mammal imagery was possible during two sorties.
During the cruise the Joint Office of Science Support (JOSS)
group of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research group maintained a
shipboard field catalog that provided real-time data to scientists on the ship
and allowed them to track ship and station progress during the cruise. It also
assisted the scientists in providing access to the service group datasets and
preliminary analyses and acted as an instrument whereby scientists could share
their observations and preliminary analyses. The catalog also allowed onshore
PIs to follow the progress of the cruise and a limited number of products were
mirrored back to a JOSS SBI catalog running in Boulder, Colorado. The SBI field
catalog (with maps and event information at sea) can be found on the webpage: (http://www.joss.ucar.edu/sbi/catalog/).
Full details on the SBI project, the field cruise program and results to date
can be found on the SBI webpage http://utk-biogw.bio.utk.edu/SBI.nsf
and associated links on that web site. In particular, a highlight summary taken
from the PI findings for the spring SBI cruise can be found on the SBI and JOSS
webpages.
|
|
Figure 1. Station location and cruise
track for the spring SBI cruise on the USCGC Healy (HLY-02-01). |
The
cruise initiated in Nome, Alaska, had a test station in the northern Bering
Sea, sailed through western Bering Strait and transited NW along the
international dateline to the 100 m isobath of NW Chukchi Sea. This entry date
and direction into the study region resulted from discussions with the Alaska
Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC), who were concerned about our transiting
through eastern Bering Strait and along the coastline during the spring bowhead
whale migration. Despite efforts at communication between groups in Alaska and
the SBI management, concerns continued to just before the cruise, specifically
related to the timing of the project in May during the spring bowhead whale
migration. As part of the resolution, the AEWC was kept informed of our
research progress, which was fully available on the JOSS web site, including an
updated station location map.
During
the cruise, ice conditions were the main limiting factor for not completing two
of the 5 transect lines outlined in the HLY-02-01 cruise plan. Heavy ice on the
outer Herald Valley line in the Chukchi Sea, slow travel time around a major
flow west of Barrow, and heavy ice over the East Barrow line inhibited our
working these transect lines. It is estimated 2 days of ship time were lost due
to ice-related delays in transit to specific science areas.
The
other major limiting factor on the success of the mission was lack of ambient
seawater from the start of the cruise. In spite of both scientist and Healy
engineering efforts, it took weeks after the cruise started to find a
satisfactory resolution of obtaining and maintaining ambient seawater flow for deck-board
incubations. An initial NSF-supported refrigerated van system with
recirculating pumps and storage tanks was unable to maintain ambient seawater
temperatures. The ultimate resolution was provided by the USCG engineering
division so that the ship connected a ballast water tank to the bow incubators
through a system for providing 7 hose connections to the incubators. When the
seawater in the ballast tank warmed up, science requested a dumping of the
water in transit and a subsequent refill on station, which occurred using air
operated pumps (AOPs) provided by the USCG. The positive attitude of the USCG
in resolving this situation and collaboration between science and USCG enabled
a viable resolution to the ambient seawater needs of the primary production and
zooplankton groups. It should be noted that there was steady heating of the
ballast seawater over the daily warming cycle, especially under clear skies. It
was during such good weather that the “dump and pump” technique was most used.
Further information on the ambient seawater bow system can be viewed in
Appendix A. It should be noted that although it was speculated that these daily
temperature swings in the deck incubators would be major problem for the summer
SBI cruise, this has not occurred. Subsequent to the end of the spring SBI
cruise the Engineering Officer, Neil Meister, had a second 7-hose connector
system built and installed for delivering ambient seawater to both sides of the
ship, which resulted in sufficient flow to maintain ambient seawater during the
summer cruise most of the time.
The
Captain, officers and crew of the USCGC Healy were very professional and
helpful, being essential to the success of the cruise goals. We appreciated the
continued, professional support provided by Captain David Visneski, Operations
Officer Joe Segalla, Executive Officer Doug Russell, Engineering Officer Neil
Meister, and Master Chief Navigator George Schwarz. Valuable support for
science was provided by the lead Marine Science Technician Glen Hendrickson,
and the other Marine Science Technicians (Sean Kuhn, Suzanne Scriven, Bridget
Cullers, and Michael Hamerski), along with the Science Officer Mike Woodrum.
The Aviation Detachment under the direction of Mike Platt provided essential
logistical support for ice surveys and limited science operations. SBI land
logistical support was ably provided by Andy Heiberg of the University of
Washington.
C. Summary of Science
Reports
Stations
occupied during HLY-02-01 were in the northern Bering Sea (test station), the
Chukchi Sea shelf (HV transect), the Chukchi outer shelf to Arctic Basin lines
(West Hanna Shoal: WHS transect), stations near Pt. Barrow, and the Barrow
Canyon (BC) line. Table 1 provides a general summary of station location,
target depth, station duration, Note that there is an interactive table with
links to station maps and event logs for each station on the JOSS SBI webpage (http://www.joss.ucar.edu/sbi/catalog/).
The
following science summaries include sampling collection information and
preliminary findings. In addition, three appendices are attached: Appendix 1 is
a summary of ballast tank information; Appendix 2 is the final service team
hydrographic report, and Appendix 3a and 3b are the ADCP reports. All
appendices, and a highlights summary (based on the current cruise report) can
be found on the JOSS webpage: http://www.joss.ucar.edu/sbi/catalog -
JOSS SBI Field Catalog.
Table 1. Station
summary for the spring SBI cruise HLY-02-01.
|
STATION
|
DATE |
MAP |
TIME(UTC) |
LATITUDE |
LONGITUDE |
TARGET
|
DURATION |
REMARKS |
|
05/08/02
|
1900
|
64.96N
|
169.14W |
50m |
12.5
hrs |
|||
|
05/10/02
|
0546
|
67.50N
|
168.91W |
50m |
19.32
hrs |
|||
|
05/12/02
|
1810
|
70.63N
|
167.45W |
50m |
10.78
hrs |
|||
|
05/14/02
|
1620
|
71.92N
|
166.24W |
50m |
9.88
hrs |
|||
|
05/15/02
|
1859
|
71.62N
|
166.00W |
50m |
1.38
hrs |
|||
|
05/17/02
|
0417
|
72.71N
|
161.24W |
50m |
3.58
hrs |
|||
|
05/17/02
|
1702
|
72.91N
|
160.55W |
75m |
12.68
hrs |
|||
|
05/18/02
|
0835
|
73.03N
|
160.48W |
165m |
12.35
hrs |
|||
|
05/19/02
|
0145
|
73.24N
|
159.59W |
500m |
13.78
hrs |
|||
|
05/19/02
|
1822
|
73.28N
|
160.11W |
1200m |
20.88
hrs |
|||
|
05/20/02
|
2104
|
73.46N
|
159.85W |
2000m |
19.00
hrs |
|||
|
05/21/02
|
1820
|
73.74N
|
158.95W |
3000m |
29.90
hrs |
|||
|
05/23/02
|
1013
|
73.44N
|
157.53W |
3000m |
24.23
hrs |
|||
|
05/24/02
|
1930
|
73.33N
|
158.19W |
2400m |
2.35
hrs |
|||
|
05/25/02
|
0336
|
73.10N
|
158.16W |
2100m |
21.25
hrs |
|||
|
05/26/02
|
0950
|
73.03N
|
157.93W |
2000m |
0.50
hrs |
|||
|
05/26/02
|
2354
|
72.87N
|
158.26W |
1100m |
13.35
hrs |
|||
|
05/27/02
|
1623
|
72.85N
|
158.48W |
500m |
16.87
hrs |
|||
|
05/28/02
|
1522
|
72.74N
|
158.61W |
200m |
15.47
hrs |
|||
|
05/29/02
|
1547
|
72.60N
|
158.74W |
100m |
10.22
hrs |
|||
|
05/30/02
|
0813
|
72.46N
|
159.44W |
70m |
0.22
hrs |
|||
|
05/30/02
|
1108
|
72.34N
|
159.71W |
60m |
0.25
hrs |
|||
|
05/30/02
|
1530
|
72.24N
|
159.77W |
50m |
13.40
hrs |
|||
|
06/01/02
|
1637
|
71.40N
|
158.13W |
90m |
2.12
hrs |
|||
|
06/02/02
|
1537
|
71.81N
|
155.68W |
100m |
11.52
hrs |
|||
|
06/03/02
|
0658
|
71.72N
|
155.41W |
200m |
0.38
hrs |
|||
|
06/03/02
|
1525
|
71.55N
|
154.56W |
40m |
1.45
hrs |
|||
|
06/04/02
|
0730
|
71.49N
|
153.90W |
50m |
4.93
hrs |
|||
|
06/04/02
|
1610
|
71.70N
|
154.22W |
90m |
1.38
hrs |
|||
|
06/04/02
|
1853
|
71.78N
|
154.40W |
100m |
0.50
hrs |
|||
|
06/05/02
|
0000
|
71.83N
|
154.62W |
200m |
1.00
hrs |
|||
|
06/05/02
|
0409
|
71.93N
|
154.82W |
500m |
15.18
hrs |
|||
|
06/06/02
|
0120
|
72.06N
|
154.42W |
1000m |
20.88
hrs |
|||
|
06/07/02
|
0722
|
72.19N
|
154.40W |
2000m |
19.57
hrs |
|||
|
06/08/02
|
1810
|
72.53N
|
154.50W |
3000m |
21.43
hrs |
|||
|
06/10/02
|
0015
|
72.18N
|
155.04W |
1000m |
2.43
hrs |
|||
|
06/10/02
|
1630
|
71.90N
|
155.66W |
125m |
2.13
hrs |
|||
|
06/11/02
|
0346
|
71.65N
|
155.76W |
200m |
10.60
hrs |
|||
|
06/12/02
|
0100
|
71.55N
|
156.20W |
160m |
1.50
hrs |
|||
|
06/12/02
|
1346
|
71.40N
|
157.17W |
100m |
11.85
hrs |
1. Hydrographic Measurements Team
Lou Codispoti: lead on-board co-PI; Jim Swift: lead PI;
Kristin Sanborn, Dean Stockwell, Robert Palomares, Doug Masten, Charlie Flagg,
Erik Haberkern, and Bob Williams: on-board team members
Preliminary Data Analysis:
Hydrographics-Over
the length of the oceanographic cruise 135 conductivity-temperature-depth
(CTD)/rosette casts to depths as great as 3,000 m were taken at 39 stations. "Raw" CTD plots were made immediately after each
cast to guide sampling during subsequent casts. Edited data were mounted on the
JOSS web site within ~ 24 hrs. Plots of our data in the form of vertical
profiles, TS plots, histograms and sections have been completed and been made
available to participants. We also performed nutrient analyses for samples
collected from the ice, and for various incubation samples. These data were
edited and provided to the PI’s who supplied the samples included
CTD-temperature, CTD-salinity, CTD-dissolved oxygen, light transmission,
fluorometric chlorophyll, fluorometric dissolved organic matter (cDOM; Haardt,
fluorometer), and PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) determinations.
Bottle samples were analyzed for salinity, dissolved oxygen, ammonium, nitrate,
nitrite, phosphate, dissolved silicon, urea and chlorophyll. . A complete description of the service team methods is
provided in the “Service group Cruise Summary Report (FINAL) under Research
Products (Station) at http://sbi/catalog_hly-02-01/station/.
Information on the ADCP equipment on the Healy is provided in two documents,
also on the JOSS web site: “Healy_ADCPs.doc” and “SBI_ADCP_Data_Collection”,
both located at http://sbi/catalog_hly-02-01/station/adcp_results/.
The general Temperature and Salinity structure was more or less as expected. Interesting features included temperature fine-structure in the halocline and near the core of the Atlantic Water. Surface salinities of less than 30 were recorded as the ship moved eastward and offshore into the Beaufort Sea, presumably due to a general freshening of the surface waters as the cruise departed the region under the direct influence of the Bering Strait inflow, and to the accumulated effects of ice-melt and river runoff. Notably, at station 10 on the EHS line at the outer slope, water with temperatures above 0°C was encountered at a depth of ~35 m in a shallow temperature maximum. Shallow temperature maxima were also encountered at stations 8 and 9 on the EHS line, but did not appear to be so well developed. This bolus of water with temperatures >-0.5C disappeared on the next section occupied to the east (stations 12-22), but there was a relatively warm intrusion with colder temperatures present at the same approximate depths at several additional stations, including stations taken in Barrow Canyon further east off Pt. Barrow. It may also be worth noting that the T and Salinity vs depth profiles in Barrow Canyon seemed to vary more from station to station than they did in the sections outside of the Canyon, indicative of the dynamic nature of the both off- and on-shore current flow within this canyon. In addition, the western Chukchi Sea showed two regions of increased southeastward flow near the shelf edge: one right at the shelf break transporting shelf-origin water, and one a bit offshore and deep transporting warm Atlantic water. An eddy like feature was found centered near 100-150 m depth on the ESH line, with a warm center and cold water on either side of it, indicative of a strong shoaling of Atlantic water properties onshore. Understanding these features will aid in investigating how physical and biochemical products are transported from the shelf to basin.
The nutrient regime measured was more or less as expected, with high initial nutrient concentrations over the shelf near Bering Strait, decreasing as we proceeded eastward and seaward. Initially, nitrate concentrations at the sea-surface exceeded 15 micromolar (µM), phosphate exceeded 1.8 µM, and surface silicate concentrations exceeded 40 µM, but surface nitrate concentrations became small by the time we reached deep water. Phosphate and silicate were always present in appreciable concentrations, but nitrate was sometimes depleted, indicative of post phytoplankton bloom conditions. Although there was some variability, there was a strong onshore-offshore nitrate gradient in our first two sections (stations, 5-11 [EHS line] and 13-22 [WHS line]. Nitrate was relatively abundant near shore, with maximum surface concentrations >7 µM at the innermost station and decreasing to essentially 0 µM at the outermost station. Although high nitrate was characteristic of the study region, we did encounter conditions that suggested the initiation of an inshore phytoplankton bloom on the Barrow Canyon line. While we expected a strong decrease in nutrients as we departed the region under the direct influence of the Bering Strait inflow, the lack of nitrate in surface waters at the offshore stations was somewhat surprising since we arrived early in the "growing" season. Examination of the nitrate, dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll data suggested an initial surface nitrate concentration of ~ 3 µM which has essentially been consumed by the time of our cruise. In other words, the spring bloom in this nutrient poor region may have already occurred, at least in the surface layer. Observations and comments on productivity in this region are scarce, so it is uncertain whether this early blooming is "normal" or related to the recent warming of the Arctic. Certainly, the ice seemed relatively thin to some of us in regions of nitrate draw down. We are also curious as to whether or not a later subsurface bloom may occur at the offshore sites since sunlight will continue to increase until 21 June and ice-cover will decrease until ~October, perhaps permitting sufficient light for phytoplankton growth to reach the uppermost halocline.
As we entered deep water, we encountered the expected nutrient maxima at about 125 m associated with Bering Strait/Chukchi waters that form the upper halocline. Nutrient concentrations in this maxima appear to be a bit lower than in the past, but whether this is correlated with the recent warming and freshening of the Bering Strait inflow, or simply a normal space/time related difference between our data and past experiments will require further analysis. As is typical, dissolved silicon (silicate) was the best nutrient for tracing this maximum because this nutrient is enriched 3-4 fold in the Bering Strait waters relative to the waters supplied to the Arctic from the Atlantic. The nearshore phytoplankton bloom appeared to be stripping nutrients from the surface waters whereas they were regenerated at depth and transported offshore. Evidence for this conclusion was provided by our observations of the highest subsurface silicate maximum in the Barrow Canyon section and by the light transmission data that suggested near surface and bottom layers were particle rich in the inshore portion of the Barrow Canyon section, with relatively clear layer in between.
Approximately coincident with the nutrient
maxima was an N** star minimum, and a maximum in "lignin" as
determined with the Haardt fluorometer. Negative N-double star suggests an
excess
of the effects of denitrification over nitrogen
fixation in a water parcel, and this parameter has
proven to be an excellent water mass tracer with
the most negative values occurring in the Pacific influenced waters and
positive values occurring in waters of Atlantic origin. In general, the
distribution of this parameter is as expected with negative values entering via
Bering
Strait and becoming more negative as the Pacific
waters reside in the Arctic Ocean and are
subjected to the effects of
denitrification in arctic shelf sediments. The Atlantic Waters enter with
positive values that decrease a bit as these deeper waters reside in the
Arctic. Observations in Fram Strait surface waters suggest that the Atlantic
Water enters with an N** value of ~ + 2, and our data suggest that this value
has decreased somewhat in the core of the Atlantic Water found during our
cruise. There may be a substantial decrease in the Atlantic waters that form
the lower halocline, but to calculate this, we have to sort out mixing
processes between the upper and lower halocline. Results from the Haardt fluorometer
may help us to do this, since the core of the maxima in these data appears to
be slightly deeper than the N** mimimum. This suggests that the Haardt
fluorometer maximum contains an appreciable component of waters from the lower
halocline that are of Atlantic and riverine origin.
Ammonium concentrations over the shelf sometimes
reached concentrations of several µM, and distributions of ammonium, nitrite and light
transmission in our three cross-shelf sections suggest plumes of material
coming off the shelf and entering the basin. Of course, the process is not
strictly two dimensional as suggested by the sections, but the occurrence of
such plumes in both sections suggests a mean cross-sectional transport from the
shelf into the basin. Preliminary results from sediment metabolism experiments
support an efflux of ammonium and silica from the sediments due to ongoing
carbon transformation processes, results which support the shelf regeneration
of biochemical products outlined previously. In general, nitrite and urea
concentrations in the water column were low, and except for one high urea
concentration the water column concentrations were low and essentially within
the detection limit of our method. High urea concentrations did occur, however,
in some of the ice samples.
2. Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Seawater
Charlie Farmer and Tadayasu Uchiyama: on-board team
members; Dennis Hansell and Nick Bates: PIs
Measurements:
Total Alkalinity, DIC (Total CO2), Dissolved Organic Carbon, Total
Dissolved Nitrogen, Particulate Organic Carbon, Particulate Nitrogen
|
Station |
Gear Type |
Samples Collected |
Comments |
|
000 |
CTD |
Sampled Bottles 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9,
10, 11, 12 |
|
|
001 |
CTD |
Sampled all Bottles except 8 |
Bottle #8 did not fire |
|
002 |
CTD |
Sampled Bottles 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10,
11, 12 |
|
|
003 |
CTD |
Sampled Bottles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
10, 12. |
Water froze in Bottles prior to
sampling |
|
005 |
CTD |
Sampled Bottles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
9, 11, 12 |
|
|
006 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
007 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
008 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
009 |
CTD |
Cast 3 Sampled Bottles 1, 5, 9, 11 Cast 4 Sampled Bottles 1, 4, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12 |
|
|
010 |
CTD |
Cast 2, Sampled Bottles 2, 5, 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12 Cast 3, Sampled Bottles 1,6,10, 12 |
|
|
011 |
CTD |
Cast 3 Sampled Bottles 2, 9, 10, 11,
12 Cast 4 Sampled Bottles 3, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11 |
|
|
012 |
CTD |
Cast 1 Sampled Bottles 3, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12 Cast 2 Sampled Bottles 3, 4, 6, 8, 9,
11 |
|
|
014 |
CTD |
Cast 1 Sampled Bottles 2, 6, 9, 11,
12 Cast 2 Sampled Bottles 3, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11 |
|
|
016 |
CTD |
Cast 1 Sampled Bottles 2, 7, 9, 11,
12 Cast 2 Sampled Bottles 2, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11 |
|
|
017 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
018 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
019 |
CTD |
Sampled Bottles 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10, 11 |
|
|
022 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
024 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
027 |
CTD |
Sampled Bottles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
10, 12 |
|
|
029 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
030 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
031 |
CTD |
Sampled Bottles 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12 |
|
|
032 |
CTD |
Cast 1 Sampled Bottles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Total Cast 1 Sampled Bottles 6, 7, 9, 10,
11 Cast 6 Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
033 |
CTD |
Cast 1 Sampled Bottles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Total Cast 1 Sampled Bottles 6, 8, 9, 10,
12 Cast 6 Sampled Bottles 3, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11 |
|
|
034 |
CTD |
Cast 2 Sampled Bottles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7 Total Cast 2 Sampled Bottles 1, 8, 9, 11,
12 Cast 3 Sampled Bottles 3, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11 |
|
|
037 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
|
039 |
CTD |
Sampled all 12 Bottles |
|
Total dissolved Nitrogen
were analyzed on board ship, other samples were preserved for return to
laboratory for analysis. Currently
analysis completed through Station 39, with data being stored on floppy disk,
CD-RW and e-mailed to RSMAS for archive.
3. Primary Production, Bio-optics, and Remote Sensing of Ocean Color
Glenn Cota: onboard PI; Dave Ruble, Zhi-Ping Mei and Xiaoju Pan: on-board team members
There have been numerous clear days with good satellite
coverage in the southwestern margins of the study area, which are sufficiently
ice-and cloud free for extensive ocean color observations. There have been blooms north of Bering
Strait, and to a lesser degree along the northwestern Alaskan coast and in
areas of ice retreat. NASA has been
providing images via ODU with less than a one day lag time, and there have
often been multiple overpasses. The day
regular sampling ceased (June 13th) we conducted an open water
optics station, which appears to suitable for validation of SeaWiFS and
MODIS. This was easily the most
important station of the cruise for bio-optical sampling and remote sensing.
Phytoplankton pigment (HPLC) and cell count sample samples
have been collected from the surface and the subsurface chlorophyll maximum at
experimental and optical stations.
Experimental observations have included primary production
as well as nitrogen uptake. Urea
concentrations remained below limits of reliable detection (Codispoti, pers
comm.), but a number of experiments were run to evaluate utilization. Isotope dilution experiments were done only
at select stations.
Simulated in situ deck incubations continue to be
problematic. The recirculating
supplemental seawater system was only marginally successful for small
incubators, and the temperature were closer to ambient. The Coast Guard has set up an alternative
flow-thru seawater system with ballast water for deck incubations, but
temperature regulation remains challenged.
A number of the experiments are compromised by elevated temperatures,
and several experiments could not be set up.
Several stations have been missed or compromised because the ship could
not position properly or in a timely fashion.
Experimental
Observations
|
Date |
SBI Station |
Secchi depth(m) |
HPLC |
Cell counts |
Primary Production |
13CO3 |
15NO3 |
15NH4 |
15N-Urea |
|
5/10/2002 |
1 |
5.5 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/14/2002 |
3 |
5.5 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/15/2002 |
4 |
4.5 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/17/2002 |
6 |
15 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/18/2002 |
7 |
26 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/19/2002 |
9 |
22 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/20/2002 |
10 |
26 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/21/2002 |
11 |
30 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/23/2002 |
12 |
26 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/24/2002 |
13 |
19 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/25/2002 |
14 |
24 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
5/27/2002 |
17 |
17 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+
IDE |
|
|
5/28/2002 |
18 |
22 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
5/29/2002 |
19 |
17 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
5/30/2002 |
22 |
15 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/01/2002 |
23 |
15 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/02/2002 |
24 |
16 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/03/2002 |
26 |
10 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/04/2002 |
28 |
11 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/05/2002 |
31 |
16 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/06/2002 |
32 |
20 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/07/2002 |
33 |
16 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/08/2002 |
34-IS |
34 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6/10/2002 |
36 |
20 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+
IDE |
|
|
6/12/2002 |
39 |
5.5 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Optical observations have been very successful, but their
frequency is less than half that planned.
Observations have included surface optics (SO), sun photometry (Sun),
passive optical (PO) profiles, and active optical (AO) profiles at daytime
stations. Quite a few SO and Sun
photometry observations have been made between stations or at multiple times during
suitable conditions at a station. These
data will be invaluable for refining high latitude bio-optical algorithms. Passive optical observations are being made
mostly in small open areas, but also in a variety of ice conditions to evaluate
the influence of broken pack ice cover.
Satellite validation measurements were impossible at all but the last
station due to the prevalence of ice along the ship track.
Optical
Observations
|
|
|
|
|
SfcOpt |
Sun |
PassOpt |
ActOpt |
ActOpt |
|
Station
# |
SBI Station # |
Secchi depth |
Water Depth |
SAS |
Micro Tops |
Pro/Ref |
AC9 |
HS6 |
|
200205081 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
+ |
+ |
|
|
200205101 |
1 (AM) |
5.5 |
51 |
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
200205102 |
1 (PM) |
|
53 |
|
|
+ |
+ |
|
|
200205121 |
2 |
|
51 |
+ |
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
200205141 |
3 |
5.5 |
47 |
+ |
7-8 |
|
+ |
+ |
|
200205151 |
4 |
4.5 |
47 |
+ |
9-10 |
|
+ |
+ |
|
200205171 |
6 |
15 |
45 |
|
|
|
+ |
+ |
|
200205181 |
7 |
26 |
171 |
|
13-14 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
200205191 |
9 |
22 |
1217 |
+ |
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
200205201 |
10 |
26 |
1891 |
|
17-18 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
200205211 |
11 (AM) |
30 |